User talk:Mykhal

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mykhal!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Disputed chemical diagrams

I notice that you recently created Category:Incorrect chemical structures. Perhaps it could be merged into the older Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. They both seem to be intended for the same purpose and I think it would be easier to have just one category to track chemistry images with errors. What do you think? Ed (Edgar181) 14:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Of course, I was not aware of this ancient category. Thanks for pointing out. ​ —Mykhal (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Zuzana caputova.jpg

Hi, please do not empty information fields and do not remove license templates. If you think there is a problem, nominate for deletion instead, using the 'nominate for deletion' link from the 'tools' menu. Jcb (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ae editor in Debian Potato.png

Copyright status: File:Ae editor in Debian Potato.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ae editor in Debian Potato.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Logo-DTSE-CZ-version-2 (cropped).png

Copyright status: File:Logo-DTSE-CZ-version-2 (cropped).png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-DTSE-CZ-version-2 (cropped).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

​ I'm not original uploader (only cropper), so I'm pinging: DTSE SK
(it wasn't pinged by you (yet?) because it originally had most likely wrong free license, removed by me) —Mykhal (talk) 20:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Moo.png

Copyright status: File:Moo.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Moo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Not sure what the license should be. It's of an app from old UNIX, which was commercial, but it was reportedly also present in e.g. 2.11BSD. So I'll hotfix it by using BSD license. But it's just a screenshot. —mykhal (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

So Ciell has deleted it, despite it was relatively trivial image (screenshot of reconstructed old text game, which was by itself non-original), its preparation took non-trivial work by me, and related license was added. —mykhal (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Papabile

Ad [1]: vyloženě na tom netrvám. Osobně mi červené kategorie na Commons v ojedinělé míře nevadí. A přišlo mi vtipné, že to je foto ze dne před zahájením konkláve a v novinách jsou tam zjevně fotky kardinálů (vpravo nahoře asi kardinál Re). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

​Now I see (a sixpack of them). Well, there are also Palest. keffiyeh, palm tress, Humvees, as well… What surprised me is some smaller skinny object behind a floating man, reading with him? Regards, —mykhal (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Seatel Navigation Sphere (logo cropped).jpg

File:Seatel Navigation Sphere (logo cropped).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seatel Navigation Sphere (logo cropped).jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I don't understand what was the problem with it, it was just a zoomed/cropped part of another photo. —mykhal (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FP6-GREEN-COMMERCIAL-WALLPAPER-HERO.png

Copyright status: File:FP6-GREEN-COMMERCIAL-WALLPAPER-HERO.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FP6-GREEN-COMMERCIAL-WALLPAPER-HERO.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

The Flickr Image uploader according to my (tiny) experience refuses to proceed if license is unsuitable, and the source web page license part links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en, so it seems it should be OK, not sure if the uploader has some temporary issues not completely filling the data … —mykhal (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

… filled in. —mykhal (talk) 17:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

eSIM Card (physical eSIM)

Hi Mykhal, beside the name eSIM (=embedded SIM) an eSIM must not be embedded (soldered) on a PCB. It can be solderd, if it is plain chip. There are plenty of eSIM cards as nao/micro/mini card available on the market. An eSIM card can be used by (mostly) any phone in the SIM slot. For details see manfucator pages like https://www.eiotclub.com/products/physical-esim-card . It's a little bit confusing with the term "e - embedded". To only and main difference to a "standard SIM card" (UUIC) is: Every eSIM (embedded or as physical card) is programmable or configurable - which a UICC is not.--Wdwd (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Remark: If you dont believe me and think that this eSIM cards are only marketing term which does exist in real: No. Please read the GSMA standard SGP.22-v2.2.2.pdf, page 8 in the line for eUICC: "A removable (!) or non-removable UICC which enables the remote and/or local management of Profiles in a secure way.". The eUUIC can also be eSIM card (or something else), according the the standard, and is not always be embedded (not removable) in a device.--Wdwd (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits

Please stop reverting my edits. As i mention above this cards are eSIMs. Same happens to my photos.--Wdwd (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Mykhal. I noticed that a deletion request you made was not done correctly.

This is not an unusual mistake, but I'm leaving you this message to help you get this right in the future.

There are several steps to making a deletion request (DR) correctly; among other things you must transclude the deletion into the correct daily DR list, and to notify the page creator and optionally other human (non-bot) editors of the page. By far the easiest way to do all of this correctly is to use the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests, which takes care of all that using vetted Javascript. If you prefer to add the {{Delete}} template or {{Category for discussion}} template manually, you are required to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed). Again, though, there is no need to follow complex instructions if you use the automatic tools.

Also worth knowing: on Commons, {{Delete}} is not a "speedy delete" request like it is on many other projects; instead, it starts a discussion of whether the file should be deleted. If you think a particular media file really obviously does not belong on Commons, see the instructions at Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. Common cases that are better handled with a speedy delete than a DR include:

• own work within 7 days (COM:CSD#G7)
• empty category never likely to be used (COM:CSD#C2).

Common bad reasons people have for making DRs in the first place include:

• after renaming a category, trying to delete the resulting redirect in violation of policy COM:CATRED
• making a DR for a file where there is already a current DR
• trying to delete one's own work within 7 days (use {{G7}} instead)
• placing {{Delete}} on the deletion subpage itself, or on a talk page.

Also, please don't use {{Ffd}} (that's an English Wikipedia thing).

If you have further questions about the deletion process, you can ask them at COM:Help desk or COM:Village pump.  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Thanks for the information. But it's obviously mistaken and unimportant redir, and I did not want to undergo a complicated procedure because of it. Obviously it was noticed, so in some sense, it worked. Regards, —Mykhal (talk) 15:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Tu Youyou in 1950s.jpg

File:Tu Youyou in 1950s.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tu Youyou in 1950s.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Note: I don't have any opinion about possible deletion, I did just improve the image by cropping out the border recently in this image uploaded in 2015. —Mykhal (talk) 13:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Category:Jair Bolsonaro in 2024

Category:Jair Bolsonaro in 2024 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Were there any images in this category when you created it? I couldn't find any photos of Jair Bolsonaro from that year. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:07, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

@Heylenny: I don't remember. Looked to my edits from that day, and it was most likely some photo with Elon Musk (not mine, I did only categorization), already deleted. —Mykhal (talk) 08:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I just created Category:Elon Musk and Jair Bolsonaro and didn't find any photos from 2024, unfortunately. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 16:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)