Commons:Help desk

Anyone, from newbie to experienced, can ask a question here. Questions will be replied to here as well. Any answers you receive are not legal advice and the responder cannot be held liable for them.
In order to get quick answers consider the following points:
- Have you checked the frequently asked questions, help pages and the help desk archive?
- For licensing and copyright issues, please use the copyright village pump
- For proposing changes to the way Wikimedia Commons works, please use the proposals village pump
- For community-wide discussions, please use the main village pump
- For changing the name of a file, please see our file renaming guidelines
- For matters requiring the attention of an administrator, please use the administrators' noticeboard or contact an individual administrator directly
- For questions about Wikipedia content, try English Wikipedia's "Teahouse"
- For questions not about Wikimedia projects, try English Wikipedia's reference desk
Resolved sections (marked by {{section resolved|1=~~~~}}) will be archived after two days. Sections with no discussion will be archived after ten days. The latest archive is Commons:Help desk/Archive/2026/02.
| SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 2 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days. | |
Request for Division-wise Highlighted Maps (Chhattisgarh 2026)
[edit]Thesurajsahu (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Thesurajsahu: you asked the same question at User talk:C1MM Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:55, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- yes, but I want images as early as possible. Thesurajsahu (talk) 05:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
My files were renamed as I uploaded
[edit]I am confused, this has never happened to me before. I uploaded two large batches of files using the upload wizard. Hundreds of photos in each batch. The first batch worked as always, the filenames were the ones I had on my files. The second batch did this very weird thing where the files were all renamed. My filenames were for example raffi̙-kojiaɲ-AM2000-0500.jpg, but the uploaded file was named Raffi_kojian-AM2000-0999_01.jpg for some reason, and then from 01 the numbers just go up.
This is very annoying for me because I can no longer match them up with the files on my computer, the file descriptions I have on my computer that I want to slowly add over time, and I can never match them to my original files by filename. It's a mess for me and I am wondering if there is a way to automatically fix this, or just delete them all and I try again, because this is not a helpful situation whatsoever. Also of course any tips on what could have caused it that I can avoid would be lovely.
Thanks RaffiKojian (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- @RaffiKojian: Is it that you can't reconstruct the original filenames and do this as a series of moves? Because that would certainly be preferred delete and re-upload. Also though, those are really poor filenames, not conforming at all to Commons:File naming. - Jmabel ! talk 07:02, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- I can offer to go through Special:ListFiles/RaffiKojian and request moves Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- ... oh no I don't have the time Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:00, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- It would take so much more time to move hundreds of files than it would to just re-upload them. I would have uploaded tens of thousands more photos to commons by now if the entire process didn't take so long, and if I could get uploading software like vicuna or commonist to work on my computer again. It's really a waste just having these sitting on my hard drive instead of here on commons. RaffiKojian (talk) 14:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Apparently all of my files were renamed in the last step of the process, and the only way I can see to stop it is to hand renumber/name thousands of files. I don't know why the site has decided to start renaming and renumbering files, but it's really annoying and pointless. It's already causing me problems finding specific photos I need to in order to add info to them, but I'm plowing ahead with uploading since I don't see a way around it... RaffiKojian (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- I can offer to go through Special:ListFiles/RaffiKojian and request moves Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
I can't post a picture.
[edit]I can't post a picture. Great turk (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was going to ask what picture until I checked your talk page and saw that your user page had been nominated for speedy deletion as an abuse of user pages
- You need to read Commons:What Commons is not Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 13:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging Yann because he notified OP that we are not a free personal web host Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 13:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- OP is not responding; closing section Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:16, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging Yann because he notified OP that we are not a free personal web host Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 13:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
How to support a challenge topic suggestion on wikipedia as a reply?
[edit]I didn't find how to support any challenge topic suggestion appear on wikimedia as I see many do the same with no issues. Need the guide as a beginner. Girlmath (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Girlmath: You mean polling templates like
Support,
Oppose,
Delete,
Keep, etc.? If so, you need to type {{Support}}, {{Oppose}}, etc. when typing in your reply (when replying, make sure in the dropdown of the
button,
Source editing is selected). See Commons:Polling templates for a complete list of polling templates. - If you meant something else, please clarify your question. HyperAnd [talk] 11:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Lien Diaphonème.
[edit]J'aimerais savoir comment transférer le fichier Diaphonème de l'utilisateur Diafonemus vers l'utilisateur Diaphonémus-Galaxie Diaphonème.Gif,Merci. Diaphonémus-Galaxie (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Diaphonémus-Galaxie: did you mean File:Diaphonème.Gif? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Saya ingin masuk ke whatsApp saya yang dulu ~2026-10299-27 (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @~2026-10299-27, this is the help desk for Wikimedia Commons, a media repository. We can't help you with your whatsapp account, you'll have to contact them for that. HurricaneZetaC 16:48, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Maaf, ini meja bantuan khusus untuk Wikimedia Commons, sebuah repositori media. Kami tidak bisa membantumu dalam masalah akun WhatsApp, itu perlu bantuan dari mereka, bukan kami. HyperAnd [talk] 21:44, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Apakah kontribusi di sini dapan royalti ?
[edit]apakah setiap kontribusi di sini dapat royalti Gautsgeelani (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Gautsgeelani,
see w:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia pay rates#Pay tables for rates- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)- @Alexis Jazz: that's an overly cute answer to give to someone with whom you don't have a common language.
- @Gautsgeelani: no, this is an entirely volunteer project. Any content you post here can be used by anyone for any legal purpose, as long as they conform to the license you offer. - Jmabel ! talk 20:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I'm sorry, I struck it. This question seems to get asked so often, it's almost like we should answer it in the edit notice or something. Is there a more serious resource (preferably with translations) you can think of that could be linked instead? There's https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2018/08/22/dont-pay-for-wikipedia-articles/ but that's not from an editor's POV and only in English.
- @Gautsgeelani: no, regular users don't get paid by the WikiMedia Foundation to contribute. Some developers and lawyers are paid if employed by the WMF. Some people are paid by third parties to be a Wikimedian in residence, but if you have to ask, that's not you. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: maybe Commons:How to#How does Commons run as a project? (which I wrote). But that's a bit lengthy and just in English. - Jmabel ! talk 03:01, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Gautsgeelani: Tidak. Wikimedia Commons adalah proyek sukarelawan. Semua konten yang kamu menerbitkan di sini bisa digunakan oleh semua orang dengan tujuan hukum apapun, selama mereka mematuhi lisensi bebas yang kamu memberikan. HyperAnd [talk] 21:14, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- No all his free it is my own video and I give all the rights Tristan91170 (talk) 18:26, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
upload an originale vidéo of bacteries
[edit]Hi, I want to upload an original vidéo of bacterias product by myself but it is refused Tristan91170 (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Tristan91170, File:Bactéries.ogg seems to work. If you are (also) trying to upload a video a non-supported format (e.g. a .mp4 file), try Commons:Video2commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:01, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
replace an existing image in existing Wiki. Tried to upload diferent image . Replace B&W with color
[edit]Tried uploading but seems to have failed. Need some help please Nestadog (talk) 23:14, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Nestadog: Looks like you hit a filter for trying to do an upload when you haven't yet supplied and confirmed an email address. - Jmabel ! talk 03:27, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- That is a filter with no action. It does not prevent uploads. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Nestadog: If you mean "File:John Langeloth Loeb Jr.jpg", then look at your talk page and at the deletion comment, which basically are to the effect that you did not provide evidence for the claims that you are the photographer and the holder of the copyright of this photo that is found elsewhere on the internet. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- I am supplying the original file. There is no copyright persay the photo is the property of Amb John Loeb and
- was supplied by him to me for use in WIKI. Also how do I find the link to his WIKI? Nestadog (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Nestadog This is a common misconception. You can release files just for use in Wikipedia, but we won't accept them. They must be free to use by anyone, anywhere, for any purpose. See COM:L. Creative Commons licenses are the easiest way to do this on Commons, and you can go through the UploadWizard for that. Since the image is widely used across the internet, you should also email VRT (read the page for information) proving that the image has truly been released by the copyright holder. HurricaneZetaC 16:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
First time uploading. Made a mess and I'm not sure how to fix it
[edit]The file Viossa Flag.png had a notice to create an SVG for it, which I did. However, I made two versions of the flag. One was an exact recreation of the original file (which due to a mistake (not by a Wikimedia user, but the external source) had a ratio of 593:398), while the other one was a one with a restored ratio of 3:2. The community the flag represents voted to upload the 3:2 version to replace the old one and keep the old ratio as an alternate version. The problem is that since I uploaded this fixed version, I uploaded an image that was NOT an exact SVG recreation of the old file. Later, we came to the conclusion that we should've uploaded the fixed ratio version as something like Viossa Flag (3-2).svg. Right now, the flags have already been marked for deletion, since the fixed version doesn't have any external sources yet to confirm it's actually being used. I'm currently waiting for a file mover to rename the files to hopefully fix the issue. Please let me know how we should proceed. Thanks a lot in advance for your time and help. JanLisaki (talk) 01:26, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Convenience links: File:Viossa Flag.svg, File:Traditional Viossa Flag.svg. - Jmabel ! talk 03:29, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- And also: File:Viossa Flag.png.
- @JanLisaki: I've commented on the deletion request. I believe these will probably be kept.
The community the flag represents
: that is rather confusing. Meaning that the speakers of this pidgin dialect had a formal vote? Or meaning something else?fixed ratio
aren't all SVG files "fixed ratio"? How would you make a variable-ratio SVG? Or do you just mean "preferred ratio"?- It would be much easier to help you if you were clear what you want done. Is there a file you are asking to have renamed? If so, as a non-filemover, for you the "move" tool on the file page will simply allow you to make a request to have the file renamed. - Jmabel ! talk 03:41, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response.
- The community is built around the central Discord server, with probably 99% of speakers being part of it. I held an informal poll in this server for which the handful of eldest community members were notified (though anyone was able to vote). This poll asked whether the 3:2 or botched 593:398 should be uploaded on Wikimedia, with the other one being considered an alternate version. This poll turned out 25 to 11 in favour of the 3:2 flag.
- Yes, I meant "fixed" in the sense of "repaired, restored". Sorry if that was confusing.
- What I am planning to do now is rename the 3:2 flag to Viossa Flag (3-2).svg, and then rename the 593:398 flag to Viossa Flag.svg. I already requested a file mover. I can't request the second renaming yet because currently the 3:2 flag is still "occupying" the name Viossa Flag.svg.
- I was mainly wondering if this is a stupid way to go about things/if there is a better way to fix the mess this created. JanLisaki (talk) 10:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Just dropping a small note to vouch for this user and the situation in general. I am a moderator of the Discord server in question, called simply "Viossa Diskordserver," which has over 6,000 members at this time, hundreds of which message regularly. We did indeed have an informal poll about this (relatively minor) aspect ratio file problem, and this change is part of our group efforts to work on the Viossa article on Wikipedia [1] to remove the issues since it's a high importance article.
- Many thanks in advance to anyone on the helpdesk volunteer team who is able to assist with this small task!
- 💚💚💚
- JezzaHehn (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- No, this is not "a stupid way to go about things."
- If you cannot make the move requests in the normal manner, spell out here what file(s) you want moved to what new filename(s), but please do that explicitly in terms of file names, not circumlocutions like " the 3:2 flag". - Jmabel ! talk 03:11, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies for the prior language barrier confusion. The requests were indeed made by User JanLisaki using the normal manner of the "move" tool. This help desk post is to confirm that the procedure was being followed correctly. I will rephrase the request here.
- This is the original file: File:Viossa Flag.png
- User JanLisaki is requesting that File:Viossa Flag.svg be renamed, and I personally suggst "Viossa Flag 3x2.svg" based on other files in this page: Category:SVG flags with an aspect ratio of 3:2
- Following this, the flag File:Traditional Viossa Flag.svg is requested to be renamed "Viossa Flag.svg" to match the original PNG version of the file (linked above).
- Again thanks for your time. Looks like you are a veteran of Commons and I salute you for your years of service 🫡 JezzaHehn (talk) 03:30, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like ChiK declined the move, most likely because the request gave no indication of the discussion here (e.g. via a permalink). @ChiK: do you still feel that the move was wrong after reading this? - Jmabel ! talk 07:46, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- I kindly confirm that you may go ahead with the proposed rename. ChiK (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like ChiK declined the move, most likely because the request gave no indication of the discussion here (e.g. via a permalink). @ChiK: do you still feel that the move was wrong after reading this? - Jmabel ! talk 07:46, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Moves done. You will probably want to edit the descriptions further. DR is still open, and there may be more you should say there. - Jmabel ! talk 20:04, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so, so much for your time and help! I'm glad this situation could be resolved.
- Do you have any advice on what I should do regarding the DR? JanLisaki (talk) 20:54, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- @JanLisaki: I think you've already said your piece, although some of it had no relation to why the files should be kept. That part of my comment was really addressed to those who have not commented on the DR. - Jmabel ! talk 22:05, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Patrolling question
[edit]Whne patrolling new files, should I mark a file as patrolled after I tagged it for deletion? The COM:PATROL page says you should, but that's generalized for all new pages. HurricaneZetaC 02:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes. If you've marked it for deletion, it doesn't need another patroller to take a look at it. - Jmabel ! talk 03:53, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- HurricaneZeta, I think so, but if you tagged it for speedy deletion it may not matter if gets deleted before any other patroller would look at it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:23, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Creating cropped version of existing image
[edit]Hello! How do I create/upload a cropped version of this existing image? OrdinaryOtter (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is very helpful: Commons:CropTool. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:05, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! OrdinaryOtter (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Updating Logo on my Company's Page
[edit]Hi there I'm a digital marketing/communications/brand manager at ASUG and I want to update the logo on my brand's page. The new logo has been taken down before for licensing issues (uploaded by the Communications Director at the time) and I want to avoid that happening again. The logo on the page is currently 6 years out of date.
Any help would be appreciated. KatieatASUG (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Does this refer to en:Americas' SAP Users' Group?
- Where can we see the new logo? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:49, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! That is the correct page. We don't currently have a media page but I can grab a link to the logo from one of our subdomains.
- I have a link to the new logo here: https://info.asug.com/hubfs/ASUG_Orange_021_logo.svg KatieatASUG (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have made the change. The logo is at File:Americas' SAP Users' Group logo as of 2026.png and is too simple to be copyrightable.
- Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy en:WP:PAID and avoid the temptation to edit the article yourself. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:27, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your help with this! KatieatASUG (talk) 16:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- KatieatASUG, while editing the article would be ill-advised, you could provide sources that establish notability on w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americas' SAP Users' Group. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Could you tell me what I'm doing wrong here?
[edit]Category:Walter John Mathams. Krok6kola (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- There is no obvious error. How is it different to what you were expecting? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:11, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for replying. It looks fine now, so I don't know what was going on at the time. Krok6kola (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Regarding free CC license
[edit]Hello, I like to add resources provided in this website related to ISKCON, but I am not clear as I didnt find any free-license provided in the website. Can somebody verify that the resources available in the website is free for reuse in Commons..? --Gpkp (talk) 10:14, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- I see no evidence of a free licence. What makes you think there might be one? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:35, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- As a rule of thumb, assume that anything you see on the internet is copyrighted until proven otherwise by an explicit confirmation of a free license or a release compatible with Commons. HurricaneZetaC 14:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Gpkp: Hi, and welcome. In addition to the above, please see COM:NETC. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:14, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- And possibly COM:THIRD if you plan to do any significant amount of uploading third-party materials. - Jmabel ! talk 19:50, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
US federal government PD X post
[edit]Hello, the "DOW Rapid Response" X account, affiliated with DOD, recently posted images which could be useful for commons (currently, there are no decent pictures of Douglas Wilson on Commons). Since it's posted on an official account, can it be uploaded to commons as PD? Or would we need further info on the author? Likewise, would a screengrab from the official stream of Wilson's sermon be fair game? Theodore Christopher (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Theodore Christopher: Do you have a reference for "affiliated with DOD"? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:29, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- Besides the fact that it's an officially verified govt' account, it is treated as such by war.gov. Theodore Christopher (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
VRT
[edit]The author provided their permisson of this picture through VRT email. It says it can be read in here, but this site requires me to log in, so I just put my username and password, but it says the password or username is wrong. There's no "sign in" like thing button either. What should I do to check this permission? Camilasdandelions (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Camilasdandelions: ask on Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard, the VRT tickets themselves can only be accessed by VRT agents for data protection reasons. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:20, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Camilasdandelions: VRT exists precisely to handle confidential correspondence, so of course only their conclusions, not their process, can be shared publicly. - Jmabel ! talk 04:41, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel Noting that the Zara Larsson + WP thing is in the media [2] (there's more) and there may be some shenanigans:[3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's really too bad that Mike Hadreas (Perfume Genius) didn't like the picture I took of him in 2017. I think it captured him a lot better than the rather generic could-be-any-musician-in-concert photo he seems to prefer. - Jmabel ! talk 06:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Everyone's a critic. But I don't know if he actually said he likes the other one better. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel More:[4] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's correct advice. It just saddens me that he prefers a generic photo that captures nothing of him. - Jmabel ! talk 07:35, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's quite good info-wise, and he links WP:PICYOU twice, so we know he found the manual. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:01, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's correct advice. It just saddens me that he prefers a generic photo that captures nothing of him. - Jmabel ! talk 07:35, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's really too bad that Mike Hadreas (Perfume Genius) didn't like the picture I took of him in 2017. I think it captured him a lot better than the rather generic could-be-any-musician-in-concert photo he seems to prefer. - Jmabel ! talk 06:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel Noting that the Zara Larsson + WP thing is in the media [2] (there's more) and there may be some shenanigans:[3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Deceased fathers' art photos
[edit]My father died in 1989 and gave me, (his son) the artwork he painted. I promised him that I would get his story and art out to the world. Can I post photos of his work on the site? I am new to Wikipedia. Thank you. A.R. Loomis (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes. Presuming no other relative has claim to have inherited the copyright, you have rights to license and share your father's work. Commons even has license templates for such situations, eg {{Cc-zero-heirs}} (for basically releasing to public domain) or {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}} (for requiring attribution). Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- If the main thing you are going to be doing here is uploading his work, I recommend explaining that (and your relation) on your user page. Also: Infrogmation's response presumes that your father's work is in scope for Commons. If he was at all a notable artist, it would be. Otherwise, it might not be: works by the average person who paints, even the average person with an art degree, would not be in scope. - Jmabel ! talk 06:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Nancy Ajram Wikipedia Article Picture
[edit]Hi, I noticed on Nancy Ajram's page that her old photo was taken down for some reason when someone else was editing her page. I want to reupload it, it's the same photo as her previous wikipedia page picture and I saved the image from images from Wikipedia under google images. Please let me know what I need to do. Thank you. Factsaudi (talk) 02:53, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Unsure what photo you're talking about. Images of Nancy Ajram are at Category:Nancy Ajram. If it's not an image there, you need to be positive that it is explicitly free licensed by the original photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Her old photo is in Category:Nancy Ajram, unfortunately her page photo had become an error code, I was wondering if there would be a way I could upload it or be able to fix the error. Factsaudi (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I checked w:Special:History/Nancy Ajram and turns out it's just file name vandalism by temporary accounts; nothing to see here (I reverted the vandalism) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging both original participants in the thread for good measure: @Factsaudi @Infrogmation Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Whyiseverythingalreadyused: Thanks. I warned them. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:10, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: You did not warn the account who vandalized. You warned the account who made legitimate edits to partly revert the vandalism. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Sorry about that, I was in a rush. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:20, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: You did not warn the account who vandalized. You warned the account who made legitimate edits to partly revert the vandalism. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I checked w:Special:History/Nancy Ajram and turns out it's just file name vandalism by temporary accounts; nothing to see here (I reverted the vandalism) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Her old photo is in Category:Nancy Ajram, unfortunately her page photo had become an error code, I was wondering if there would be a way I could upload it or be able to fix the error. Factsaudi (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Copyright help regarding File:Kaader filmist "põld".jpg
[edit]I submitted a scene from the film "Põld" which was made in the USSR, 1978. It is not affiliated with the USA in any way (I have checked). According to the Estonian film institute every audio-visual work (film) shown for business or distributed is under copyright. It does not mention only visual works nor does it remark that scenes are under copyright. Should I take the image down, or?
--Koidutar (talk) 09:32, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Koidutar: It is still under a copyright in Russia (and in most of the world), which is the successor country. Yann (talk) 09:56, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
jakie rozszerzenie ma mieć plik tekstowy przesyłany do WIKI
[edit]jakie rozszerzenie ma mieć plik tekstowy przesyłany do WIK Andrzej Bochnacki (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Andrzej Bochnacki: Hi, You do not send text with an extension. You post the plain text in the relevant project, which is certainly not Wikimedia Commons. For the Polish language Wikipedia, please see pl:. Yann (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Removal of Images Posted in Exchange for Replacements
[edit]Hello, I would like to kindly request the removal of my contributions from:
- 23:10, 20 February 2026
- 21:17, 12 February 2026
Unfortunately, these images are unprofessional and I would like to have them replaced with the owner's professional images as seen in Muck Rack and Medium (their journalistic pages).
Please let me know if this is possible for this is needed as soon as possible.
Thank you. Reclaim Project Global (talk) 23:15, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Reclaim Project Global: Hi, In such cases, please just add
{{SD|G7}}in the file description. Thanks, Yann (talk) 23:32, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Request for collaboration
[edit]I am currently in the process of vectorising File:Colour 18-col PT with labels.png. I have reached the stage where I start filling out all the cells with their atomic numbers and chemical symbols. Is anybody who is experienced with writing S.V.G. code by hand willing to help me out with a few parts? All alone this would take a while! ![]()
Best regards, Lekritz (talk) 11:35, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Lekritz: possibly better asked at Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop. - Jmabel ! talk 19:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Кугаевский Александр Федорович
[edit]Здравствуйте, пожалуйста разблокируйте, фотографию которую я загрузил. Вероятно я неправильно указал дату фотографии. Но авторские права на нее принадлежат мне. Так как это семейное фото, а я внук и владелец не посредственно этой фотографии и прав на нее. На фото изображен мой дед. Я пишу про него страницу в википедии. 545пятьчетырепять (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, It looks like you already found the page Undeletion requests. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:31, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
fotos hechas de ia por personas
[edit]hola se puede agregar los articulos con imagenes hechas con ia pero creadas por mi o solo imagenes normales de dominio publico MARS23434 (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- "ia" significa https://archive.org/ ? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Koavf: presumo intelegencia artificial. - Jmabel ! talk 04:06, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, muy Bien. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Porfa, mira Commons:AI-generated media. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:11, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pero mejor en español.
- @MARS23434: para imágenes creadas por IA, no existe ningún autor con derechos de propiedad intelectual; el creador es la IA, que no tiene derechos. Entonces, legalmente, no son creadas ni por Vd. ni por ninguno otro persona. Pero hay muy pocos imágenes creadas por IA que cumplen con el alcance de Commons. Véase Commons:Contenido multimedia generado por inteligencia artificial. - Jmabel ! talk 04:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
About CC BY-SA 2.0
[edit]I have a picture that was shared under CC BY-SA 2.0. I airbrushed some objects in it. Do I upload it as "created by me"? When I select that, the box where you're supposed to put in the name of the original author is not shown; which confuses me since the license requires giving attribution to the author. Baltalı İlah (talk) 18:14, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Baltalı İlah In the UploadWizard I think you should click that it was made by someone else, released under CC BY-SA 2.0, and in the author field enter the author's name and (modifications made by Baltalı İlah). Since it's a ShareAlike license, if your changes are significant enough to get copyright protection on their own those changes should also be licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 or a compatible version. HurricaneZetaC 18:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Also: when you know the end result you want and can't get it out of Special:UploadWizard there are basically two ways to go:
- use Special:UploadWizard, then hand-edit afterward.
- skip Special:UploadWizard entirely, use Special:Upload and fill everything in by hand before uploading. I normally use Special:Upload, and have used the Wizard only to experiment with it. My usual workflow is to copy the Wikitext of a similar file, paste that into Special:Upload, and edit it there before uploading. - Jmabel ! talk 20:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Insania
[edit]Excuse me. Are these photos currently approved by e-mail? Insania_80s.jpg
- Insania_Crossfade.jpg
- Insania_KultHyeny.jpg
- Insania_RockForPeople.jpg
- Insania_RockNFreud.jpg
- Insania_Spam.jpg
- Insania_USA.jpg
- Insania_VirtuRitual.jpg ?
E-mail had been sent to permissions-cs@wikimedia.org. Could you please check mailbox and respond to it? AdVony (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @AdVony: Like the bot message says on the page, e-mail has been received but it still has to be processed by an agent. It can take some time for e-mail in a language other than English. In the meantime, please indicate the source. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks AdVony (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
article submission
[edit]I have a written article for upload It includes photographs from personal items regarding the company referenced. They are not critical to the article, but make it more interesting. Statements in the article include citations, but sources are old and not online. Kristine Weis (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Kristine Weis:
- Is this about Draft:Infanseat Company/Infant carriers or something else?
- Is there a question here about Wikimedia Commons (the site on which you are asking this)?
- For what it's worth, there is no problem with using offline sources in the English-language Wikipedia, as long as they are correctly cited. I do not see any proper citations in your draft there, but that is an en-wiki issue, not a Commons issue.
- Jmabel ! talk 21:03, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Copyright of an ancient photo with no copyright
[edit]Hello. Using AI I have created a restored version of a well spread and known photo an historical venezuelan character. This person died over 70 years ago —actually 125 years—, so as far as I know his image is free to use, yet I was warned that my image might be deleted. I was totally clear about the fact that the image was created using AI and that the original work is not mine but a extremely low quality image at Wikipedia. How do I state the Copyright of this image correctly? Salvadoroff (talk) 10:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, the issue at File:Gottfried August Knoche (s.f.).png was just that you weren't clear enough about the original work; you'd said it was "un retrato de estudio vintage" without saying where it specifically came from, and why you believed it to be in the public domain.
- I've now updated the file's description and copyright status based on the response you gave on your talk page. Belbury (talk) 11:26, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Structured data: copyright license
[edit]So I uploaded File:Archive.is malicious DDoS code screenshot.png and noticed it got added to the hidden Category:Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike missing SDC copyright status. Tried to add structured data:
I get the following errors:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
[edit]An entity with copyright license should also have a statement for copyright status with one of the following values:
- copyrighted
- copyrighted, dedicated to the public domain by copyright holder
- no known copyright restrictions
- not yet determined
copyright status
[edit]An entity with copyright license should also have a statement for copyright status with one of the following values:
- copyrighted
- copyrighted, dedicated to the public domain by copyright holder
- no known copyright restrictions
- not yet determined
copyright status is not a valid qualifier for copyright license – the only valid qualifiers are:
- start time
- end time
- applies to part
- work available at URL
- object named as
- reason for deprecated rank
- reason for preferred rank
- title
- author name string
- latest start date
- ...
Values of copyright license statements should be instances of copyright license (or of a subclass of it), but copyright status currently isn't.
I also tried to add copyright status as a qualifier of the license and remove the copyright status item, but it resulted in a different error:
An entity with copyright license should also have a statement for copyright status with one of the following values:
- copyrighted
- copyrighted, dedicated to the public domain by copyright holder
- no known copyright restrictions
- not yet determined
copyright status is not a valid qualifier for copyright license – the only valid qualifiers are:
- start time
- end time
- applies to part
- work available at URL
- object named as
- reason for deprecated rank
- reason for preferred rank
- title
- author name string
- latest start date
- ...
So, how do I get rid of these errors? I just want to say in the structured data that it's copyrighted CC-BY-SA-4.0, but this is super confusing. Amberkitten (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Amberkitten: my own suggestion to minimize frustration here: just delete the SDC you tried to create for copyright, and let the bot do it. Those "missing SDC" categories are mainly for the benefit of a bot. Yes, there would be ways to work through this by hand, but I see no good reason for a human to take time for what a bot does well. - Jmabel ! talk 17:41, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. Someone fixed this for me already but next time I'll just leave it be. Amberkitten (talk) 01:14, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Can I upload this?
[edit]Can I upload a screenshot of a program that uses an MIT Software License?
Thanks,
WalnutBloom (talk) 17:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- @WalnutBloom Sure, see {{MIT}}. HurricaneZetaC 17:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- (cross-posted) @WalnutBloom: Typically yes, but it is possible that a particular screenshot contains other copyrighted content. For example, if a browser were released under the MIT Software License, that wouldn't magically license every page on the Internet if shown in the context of that browser. - Jmabel ! talk 17:44, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Pir Syed Arif Ali shah tirmizi Al hussaini 2026
[edit]Pir Syed Arif Ali Shah Tirmizi (2026) Description: Portrait of Pir Syed Arif Ali Shah Tirmizi, spiritual leader from Swat, Pakistan. Own work, 2026 Pirsyedarifshahtirmizi (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Pirsyedarifshahtirmizi: Hi, Please do not post 3 times the same message. Such a portrait would be OK only if you have taken it yourself with your camera or smartphone. Otherwise, a formal written permission from the photographer will be needed. Yann (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Copyright status for File:Bill Crews 001aa
[edit]I just uploaded File:Bill Crews 001aa and I get a message saying there is not enough copyright info. I can't see what I have left out, since I uploaded it the same way I always have. Sardaka (talk) 10:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Sardaka: It looks like File:Bill Crews 001aa.jpg is the same photo from [5]. Is it really your own photo? HyperAnd [talk] 12:21, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
